───✱*.。:。✱*.:。✧*.。✰*.:。✧*.。:。*.。✱ ───
Execution Summary
- Project Prometheus establishes a database infrastructure to manage and analyze xenomorph biological data, which is important for advancing Weyland-Yutani’s research into xenomorph genetics and threat assessment. The project integrates a relational SQL database for structured specimen tracking and a MongoDB NoSQL database for flexible, nested genetic data storage. This dual-database approach ensures scalability, security, and analytics precision
Relational Database Enhancement
- The relational database provides a structured framework for managing xenomorph specimen data, genetic samples, research sessions, and evolutionary stages. The design emphasizes data integrity, security, and efficient querying through advanced schema design and stored procedures
Advanced Schema Design
GENETIC_SAMPLES
→ stores data on biological samples (DNA, RNA, protein, tissue, blood) with constraints ensuring valid sample types, purity percentages (0-100), and classification levels (1-10). ReferencesSPECIMENS
andEMPLOYEES
RESEARCH_SESSIONS
→ tracks research activities (e.g., Sequencing, Cloning) with constraints on session types and success rates (0–100). Links toGENETIC_SAMPLES
,RESEARCH_PROJECTS
, andEMPLOYEES
SPECIMEN_EVOLUTION
→ records specimen life stage transitions (e.g., Egg, Facehugger, Adult) with threat change (-5 to 5) and stability status (Stable, Unstable, Critical). ReferencesSPECIMENS
andEMPLOYEES
Stored Procedures
sp_ProcessGeneticSample
→ automates sample processing, validating inputs (specimen ID, sample type, employee ID) and generating unique sample IDs. Updates specimen status to ‘Study Complete’ for DNA/RNA samples ≥95%sp_GetResearchSummary
→ generates comprehensive reports for specimens or projects, retrieving specimen details, genetic samples, research sessions, and evolutionary data filtered by classification level. Includes aggregate metrics like average purity and success ratessp_ExportToNoSQL
→ facilitates data export to MongoDB in JSON format, supporting ETL processes for cross-database integration
Security Measures
- Roles →
Researcher
(SELECT
,INSERT
on key tables) andAdministrator
(full CRUD and database control) - Audit Logging →
SPECIMEN_AUDIT_LOG
table andtrg_SPECIMENS_Audit
trigger track changes (INSERT
,UPDATE
,DELETE
) to specimens, logging user, timestamp, and status changes - Data Validation →
trg_GENETIC_SAMPLES_Validation
trigger ensures valid specimen status before sample insertion, preventing unauthorized or invalid data entry
NoSQL Implementation
- The MongoDB implementation provides a flexible document-based storage solution for xenomorph research data, optimized for complex, nested genetic and behavioral attributes
Alien Data Storage Solution
- Database and Collection → created
xenomorph_research
database withalien_research
collection to store specimen data, dropped and recreated for iterative development - Document Schema → each document includes
specimen_code
,discovery_site
,research_notes
,researcher
,genetic_info
(nested DNA, RNA, mutations), andthreat_assessment
Query Operations
- Insertions →
insertMany
adds multiple specimen documents with varied genetic and behavioral data (such as XM-001 with acid blood or XM-005 with camouflage) - Queries → finds documents by threat level (e.g., 8) or discovery site (e.g., LV-426), supporting rapid data retrieval for high-risk specimens
- Updates → updates research notes and threat assessments (e.g., XM-001 threat level increased to 10 due to acid blood corrosion)
- Aggregations → groups documents by threat level and researcher, counting occurrences to identify research focus areas
System Integration
ETL Process
- The
sp_ExportToNoSQL
procedure exports SQL data to JSON, enabling seamless transfer to MongoDB. This supports hybrid analysis, combining structured relational data with flexible NoSQL documents - Example: Specimen data from SQL Server (e.g., XX121-001) is exported to MongoDB, where nested genetic_info fields enhance analytical flexibility
- Manual updates, such as the research note for XM-001, are synchronized across systems via targeted SQL updates and MongoDB
updateOne
operations
Security Implementation
- SQL Server → role-based access control and audit triggers ensure data integrity and traceability. The
trg_GENETIC_SAMPLES_Validation
trigger enforces specimen status checks - MongoDB → security considerations include integration of role-based access (within the MongoDB website—not directly in the
.js
submission) and encryption for sensitive genetic data
Technology Comparison
Relational vs NoSQL
Data Structure
- SQL Server → ideal for structured data with fixed schemas (such as
GENETIC_SAMPLES
,RESEARCH_SESSIONS
). Enforces referential integrity and supports complex joins for cross-table analysis - MongoDB → suited for semi-structured, nested data (such as
genetic_info
with varying attributes). Simplifies storage of diverse specimen types but lacks strict referential integrity
Scalability
- SQL Server → scales vertically, requiring robust hardware for large datasets. Efficient for transactional operations and standardized reporting
- MongoDB → scales horizontally, distributing data across servers for high-volume, unstructured data. Better for rapid prototyping and flexible queries
Query Performance
- SQL Server → optimized for complex joins and aggregations (such as
sp_GetResearchSummary
). Requires careful indexing for performance - MongoDB → excels in nested queries and aggregations (such as
genetic_markers.mutation_rate
). Performance depends on indexing and pipeline optimization
Use Case
- SQL Server → best for standardized research processes, audit logging, and regulatory compliance (e.g., specimen containment status)
- MongoDB → ideal for exploratory genetic analysis, rapid data ingestion, and cross-species comparisons with variable attributes
Recommendations
- Use SQL Server for operational data (such as specimen tracking, employee assignments) requiring strict consistency and auditing
- Use MongoDB for research data (such as genetic markers, behavioral notes) needing flexibility and scalability for evolving datasets
Collaboration Reflection
- I collaborated with Riker on this implementation, and we both worked on different components of the project, I mainly focused on the NoSQL implementation, whereas Riker focused more on the SQL implementation. I also used Claude AI as well as ChatGPT to fix up some of my grammar and help out with my documentation and code styling.
Strategic Recommendations
- Continue leveraging SQL Server for operational and compliance-driven data, with MongoDB for research and genetic analysis. Implement automated ETL pipelines to streamline data synchronization
- Extend MongoDB security with role-based access and encryption. Enhance SQL Server audit logging to include research session changes.
- Invest in MongoDB sharding for large-scale genetic data and SQL Server partitioning for high-volume specimen records
- Develop advanced MongoDB aggregation pipelines for real-time genetic mutation tracking. Enhance SQL Server reporting with dynamic dashboards for threat assessment
- Standardize hybrid database templates for other bioengineering projects, ensuring modularity and reusability. Explore machine learning integration for predictive threat analysis using combined SQL/NoSQL data
───✱*.。:。✱*.:。✧*.。✰*.:。✧*.。:。*.。✱ ───